Sponsorship exclusivity: Why sharing is not caring

In sponsorship, one golden promise makes the big money flow: exclusivity. The idea that your brand gets to own a space, be the one and only, and enjoy a clean stage without rivals crowding your spotlight.

But today, sponsorship exclusivity is starting to look like a myth. Rights holders are carving up the same categories, reselling them by region, repackaging them for host countries, and generally milking every square inch of commercial value they can find.

So what happens when one brand pays well in excess of $100 million to be the global sponsor of the World Cup, only to discover they will be sharing that space with a competitor?

Sharing is not caring

Let’s talk about FIFA. Qatar Airways is FIFA’s Global Airline Partner. That title doesn’t come cheap. It comes with rights across every tournament, every market, and every touchpoint. Or so they thought.

For the 2026 World Cup, American Airlines has been named the official airline partner of the tournament, at least in the United States. That’s right. Two airlines. One tournament. The same sky.

To a fan walking into a World Cup fan zone in Dallas, it doesn’t matter who paid more. They see two logos and assume both are official. The difference between “global partner” and “regional supporter” might be apparent in a contract, but in the real world, it’s invisible.

Sure, American Airlines may not be a direct competitor in terms of routes, but both airlines use sponsorship to shape brand perception and drive softer gains in trust, preference, and prestige. And while American Airline’s deal is technically regional, their activation, especially across social media, won’t stop at the border.

What's next? Will Aramco wake up to find Chevron has been named the official oil and gas partner of the US World Cup? Will Hyundai be informed that Ford is now the official car of the World Cup in North America? Why not sell Pepsi fan zones in Europe, or sell Nike sponsorship of the penalty shootouts only? These may be exaggerated examples but make no mistakes, many rights holders would do it to you if they thought they could get away with it.

The role of sponsorship exclusivity

Sponsorship exclusivity is not a nice-to-have. It’s one of the main reasons we buy sponsorships in the first place. You get clarity when you’re the only bank, the only beer, the only airline. Ownership. Differentiation. You stand out. You get to lead.

It's one of the reasons why brands pay through the nose to sponsor The Masters. Without sponsorship exclusivity, you’re just another logo on the backdrop.

Why rights holders do it

One word: money. By chopping up global rights into regional and local pieces, rights holders like FIFA can sell the same category more than once. And who can blame them? It’s a cash machine.

But it’s also short-term thinking. Every time a top-tier sponsor gets undercut by a local rival, a little more trust is lost. A little more value is drained. And eventually, sponsors start asking the obvious question: what exactly are we paying for?

Do you think sponsors should push back?

If brands want sponsorship exclusivity, they need to demand it. In writing. With consequences.

That might mean:

• Blocking same-category sponsors in key host markets

• Veto power on regional deals

• Clear rules on who can activate, where, and how

And if that’s not on offer, the price needs to drop because the value is gone.

So, does sponsorship exclusivity matter?

Absolutely. There are some categories where multiple brands can coexist. But sponsorship exclusivity isn't optional if you’re a beer, a bank, or a car brand, categories with real competitive firepower. It’s everything. Without it, you might as well just run a media campaign and hope for the best.

Rights holders will argue that sponsorship today is more flexible, more layered, and more collaborative. Sometimes they’re right. Not every team or tournament needs to offer hard category lockouts. Not every brand needs to pay for them.

But if you're handing over top-tier money that runs into tens or hundreds of millions, you're not paying to share the stage. You’re paying to own it. And you should demand the protection that level of investment warrants.

Exclusivity is what separates sponsorship from advertising. Don't let anyone convince you otherwise.

Subscribe to The Sponsor and get access to practical sponsorship tips, exclusive interviews and expert insights.