Can the Tour de France keep up with its own price tag?
With 23 teams and 38 official backers, the Tour de France might appear financially secure. Indeed, money has been pumped into the sport from the Middle East and big European companies over the last ten years. Yet behind the €600 million-plus collective budget lies a stark reality: 15 of the 23 squads are scrambling to secure new title sponsors for seven-figure deals. High-profile departures (Deceuninck from Alpecin‑Deceuninck), mergers (Intermarché‑Wanty with Lotto) and closures (Arkéa‑B&B Hotels) underscore a competition desperately in need of more democratically distributed sponsorship opportunities.
Budgets balloon, smaller teams squeeze
Over the past 15 years, cycling’s financial stakes have exploded. UAE‑Team Emirates reportedly operates on about €55 million annually, an aspirational floor that mid‑rank outfits struggle to approach. “It shouldn’t be possible that in one year 15 teams are looking to increase their budget,” warns Cofidis manager Cédric Vasseur. As bigger budgets fuel higher rider salaries, less‑resourced teams risk losing their competitive footing or collapsing entirely.
The perils of unchecked growth
Ironing out a sustainable model has proved elusive. “If you only see your team getting better by injecting more money…the ultimate consequence is that you need more money,” says Tudor Pro Cycling’s Raphael Meyer. Without guardrails, cycling risks pricing out smaller participants and deterring sponsors who compare jersey real estate costs unfavorably with football or Formula 1. Jayco‑AlUla’s Brent Copeland notes that, on a pure cost‑per‑exposure basis, some top cycling teams now far exceed leading motorsport and soccer partnerships.
The takeaways
The sponsorship turbulence around the Tour de France offers clear guidance for brands. First, set grounded expectations. With team budgets rising so quickly, brands must assess ROI carefully and demand clarity on audience reach and engagement. High visibility doesn’t always justify the price tag.
Second, prioritise structural sustainability. Teams like Lidl-Trek and Cofidis show the value of long-term strategy over short-term spending sprees. Investing in teams with stable models, diversified income, or co-title arrangements can offer more security than backing volatile, overspending outfits.
Finally, lean into narrative value. Sponsors like Decathlon and CMA CGM are backing cycling not just for exposure, but for its association with health, mobility, and European identity. In a market flooded with options, the strongest partnerships are built on purpose, not just placement.
Subscribe to The Sponsor and get access to practical sponsorship tips, exclusive interviews and expert insights.
